DMK to provoke Dravida Nadu secession in the wake of Union Government call Krishnasamy Action Report....!

Dr. Krishnasamy's statement in this regard does not yet include the shouts of a crowd chanting "India, the United States of America". The rule and power of this state has been leapfrogging since the day they came to power. The ‘Belongs to the Dravidian stock’ was posted on Twitter on May 07 and should be matched with what was circulated. Suddenly thoughts like this do not germinate in them today. But there is another intrinsic motive behind singing the refrain ‘State Autonomy - Union Government’ and now chanting it aloud.

In 1962, the then Prime Minister Nehru gave in to the sole rhetoric of "banning the DMK" and abandoned the "separatist slogan of Dravida Nadu". However, they say, "Anna has left saying that even if the request is temporarily dropped, the factors that led to Dravida Nadu's request remain the same." It is clear that the DMK is once again dusting off the demand for a "Dravidian state" with the slogan "Union Government". In DMK's view, "Dravida Nadu" is the only country. India is neither a nation nor a country; One step above the panchayat is the value for the union above. With that in mind, everything is now referred to as the ‘Union Government’, including the Chief Minister’s statement.

The DMK and its political allies have been deliberately translating the first clause of Article of the Constitution of India, “INDIA that is BHARAT shall be a union of states” into “Google” with the intention of misrepresenting the Central Government as “Union Government” and carrying out a defamation campaign against the people of Tamil Nadu. . Did Google get them to translate the phrase “Union of States” into circulation in the Indian Constitution for almost 100 years? Has there been a famine for good scholars and legal experts in Tamil Nadu?

Before coming to power, they used the term "fascism" to denounce the rulers in the middle. They are now directly attacking the sovereign Indian nation. Therefore, the onslaught of the DMK and its allies on the Indian Central Government - the Indian Empire cannot be easily taken and passed on by any Indian citizen. An end must be put to the illusion that we are using the word "Union" itself as "Union" in the Indian Constitution. Ordinary citizens who are unaware of the full features of the Constitution can easily accept and simply accept their claim that the Union is the Union and the States are the State.

But that is not the truth. India needs to look at the history of slavery, the history of its restoration and independence, in conjunction with and in line with the Constitution designed for the nation. They deliberately cover up the history of India being enslaved for 300 years under the East India Company for 200 years and directly under the British government for 100 years and before that India had been subjected to many foreign invasions for more than 1,000 years and completely lost its address.

The freedom fighters of India did not fight alone for the liberation of any particular part of India. They fought for a wider Indian national liberation. Independence for India, therefore, was to liberate the nine territories of "British India" and 600 states known as the "Indian States" from the direct control of the British government. Therefore, after the partition of Pakistan, the term "Union of States" was used to indicate that all the remaining parts of India were united or united to reclaim India's lost address and re-emerge.

Before the new constitution of a country was drafted, what was that nation like; What is its history? Constitutional founders have a duty to know that. On that basis, they have made it abundantly clear that the Union of States is the only indivisible united nation. But, as the DMK claims, India is not a federation of other states or countries like the United States, Canada and Russia. But despite this, they are trying to impose on the people of Tamil Nadu an unconstitutional and untrue notion that India is a federal state of many states.

Sovereignty of India is permanent; Has Eternal; Indestructible; Unbreakable. The country may have many languages, many races, many religions; Can also act as panchayat, municipality, corporation, circle, district, state. But, apart from all that can operate within a single Indian nation, there can be no separation. Apart from the partition of the country by the imperialists, there has been no partition in independent India in the last 74 years. However, Sikkim, which was a separate state until 1974, as well as parts of Kashmir, which had been a separate state under Article 370 until last year, are now united within the Indian Empire.

Therefore, those who can use Tamil Nadu as a 'separate country' because it has the status of 'country' are the ones who can put forward the Dravidian demand of the past today. Even in Tamil Nadu, many towns have the status of 'country'. Will all those villages become nations for that? The Constitution of India defines the separate powers of the Central and State Governments.

The three centers of power, the Central Government, the State Government and the Local Government, are now enshrined in the Constitution of India. The Gram Panchayat Raj has municipal laws, so it is as if the panchayat chief or mayor mocks the head of state, just as the state government belittles the Indian Empire as a "Union Government".

A panchayat or municipality must act independently with the financial strength it has and depend on the state government. Can the state government even change their boundaries if it wants to? But can any panchayat or municipality pass a resolution that does not come under the control of the state? Similarly, Tamil Nadu can be divided on the basis of demands if the Central Government thinks of it as Southern Tamil Nadu, Northern Tamil Nadu, Eastern Tamil Nadu, Western Tamil Nadu and Central Tamil Nadu; It is also possible to change the boundaries of Tamil Nadu. Similarly, after 1956, the states were divided linguistically and administratively on the basis that political-power should be decentralized. Slogans to divide several states continue.

You have not even fought for the status of a linguistic state, for which the survivors are from Andhra Pradesh. Even the name change of Tamil Nadu came about through the sacrifice of Sankaralinganar who survived a real fast without food and water. It has always been your habit to come to power with lies and slander. But any citizen who is obsessed with this nation will not accept the same style of adherence to national unity; Can not be accepted. The DMK and its henchmen must act knowing the beauty and glory of the Constitution of India. Continuing to call the sovereign Indian Empire the ‘Union Government’ is tantamount to hurting the feelings of eight crore Tamils ​​and harassing 140 crore Indians, both illegal and anti-national.

The DMK and its allies refer to the Indian state as the 'Union Government' and the divisive slogan of 'Dravida Nadu' as one and the same content. Already talking about ‘separatism’ and losing power in 1976 and 1991 will be forgotten? If this continues, there is no doubt that the decision to come after five years will come in the fifth month. To this day, the central intelligence and internal affairs department do not pay attention as the implicit meaning of belittling the central government as the ‘Union Government’ through misinterpretation is not known.

India, i.e. the United Kingdom of India. No one can tear it apart; History has shown to humanity the true power of positive thinking. I would like to remind you again. "INDIA that is BHARAT shall be a union of states" means that India will be a united sovereign "empire". Tamil Nadu is a state despite its status as a "country". Krishnasamy said in a statement that the Dravida Nadu demand was hidden behind the DMK's slogan "Union Government".